Michael
O'Brien, Founder and President
Cincinnati Business Courier
February 14, 2003
Having open and productive conversations is absolutely critical in today’s high-velocity business environment. If our conversations go nowhere, failure will quickly follow.
Let’s focus on a few things that can make your conversations more
effective and productive. Let’s start by looking at how successful your most recent
conversations have been. In the last week did you have
any conversations that:
- Were meant to produce a course of action or develop an understanding that fell flat?
- Got mired down in a meeting when consensus was needed?
- Focused on some point of conflict or difficulty that never got resolved?
Most likely, your answer is yes.
The problem is simplemost of us think we’re having
conversations when we really aren’t. For us to have a
productive conversation a dialogue should be taking
place and it usually isn’t. Instead, we are having one
way conversationsor monologues.
I talk and tell you what I want to tell you.
You talk, and tell me what you want to tell me. Or you
tell me what you think I want to hear so I’ll leave you
alone.
We’re very good at taking turns talking. But neither
side is exploring and discovering and building on what’s
being said. We aren’t solving problems. We’re usually
creating them.
There’s a difference between what typically passes for
"conversation" and what is true "dialogue." The difference
is that for dialogue to occur, at least one of those
engaged in it has to be curious.
Consider the Greek parents of the word dialogue. Dia,
which signifies the passing of something from one to
another, and legesthae, meaning to tell or to talk. The
nobility of their marriage is a true wonder of the world.
Introduce dialogue to any occasion and you create rich
possibilities. Engage two people in a dialogue-and one
of them can dependably benefit from the other’s experiences.
That’s why it’s important to learn the art of dialogue
and practice it daily in all your communications.
To practice the art of dialogue, all parties must agree to:
- question each other and be genuinely curious about why the other thinks the way they do.
- draw out each other’s beliefs, assumptions, conclusions, speculations, hopes and anxieties, etc.
By agreeing to be curious about another point of view,
we can create a two-way, non-defense, open communication
that examines assumptions and becomes a conversation
geared to mutual discovery.
To help promote the art of dialogue, you must be willing
to:
- state your own view and ask others for their reactions.
- be wrong
- be curious as to why others think what they believe is
correct or true
- accept that you may be unaware of certain facts and
be open to new information and changing your mind
- interpret how others are thinking and reacting and
seek to understand their underlying feelings.
When the value of creating dialogue is seen from this
perspective, it’s easy to see how most conversation is
more like two related monologues. Monologues are
usually about telling the other person what you think,
giving directions and or convincing someone to adopt
your point of view. Sometimes outright manipulation is
the real agenda. When this happens, the promise of a
new discovery or breakthrough is lost.
Dialogue lets us discover more of our own intelligence
and blend it with the knowledge and wisdom of
others. Clear and powerful agreements can result from
dialogue, whereas little worthwhile insight is likely to
come from simultaneous monologues. And they rarely
inspire anything more then weak commitments to act.
Under pressure and stress, breakdowns in communications
are "normal." When the breakdown occurs,
instead of having a conversation that supports the
mutual discovery of a clear path of action to success,
words become weapons with combatants wielding them
in an attempt to force others to surrender their viewpoints.
Nobody wins when that happens. Nothing gets
accomplished. The truth is, when conversations become
miniature battlegrounds, nobody is even thinking about
accomplishing anything. They’re thinking about themselves.
To avoid these miniature battlegrounds, start by understanding
how conversations break down. When people
are engaged in this type of combatant discussion,
they’re engaged in what we call "reactive cycle." It takes
place when people "react" in a conversation instead of
participate in one. And if left unchecked, the reactive
cycle can do more than kill the productivity of a conversation,
it can damage relationships.
To understand reactive cycles, let’s look at how our
mind acts when we’re engaged in one. It starts when
someone says something you don’t like or agree with.
At that moment, you judge them. In a split second, you
have decided they’re insensitive, uncaring, selfish, dishonest
or irresponsibleor all of the above. They haven’t
changed. What changed is that your emotions kicked
in. That happens when we feel threatened, out of
control, defensive and/or some form of fear. We react
by attempting to control the situation, the person or we
simply retaliate.
When you react in this manner, you inevitable say
something the other person doesn’t likeand then they
assess you; just as we described above. Their fears kick
in andyou guessed itthey react to you by attempting
to gain control as much as you did. This, in turn,
appears to you to justify your original assessment of
them and causes you to react againwhich reactivates
them!
You are now locked in the downward spiral of the
reactive cycle with predictable resultsyou hold another
unproductive discussion or meeting that produces no
useful action.
There are three steps we need to take to break the
reactive cycle:
- name itone of the parties notices they’re engaged in
the reactive cycle and "names" it.
- one or both of the parties "claims" their responsibility
for being reactive.
- both parties try to understand their ownand the
others’perspective and emotions and enter into
dialogue. They "reframe" their perspectives.
After we’ve named, claimed and re-framed our reactive
cycle, we can engage in the type of open, honest and
productive discussion needed to accomplish our mutual
objectives.
By learning the art of dialogue we help ensure that
everyone is on the same page and moving forward in
the same direction.
|